QX60 Sensory vs Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

/

5.5

Engine / Motor

/

240

/

6

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

5033

4945

1981

1975

1770

1715

2900

2955

170

/

/

737

Fuel Economy

8.7

9.2

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

Triple

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

3498 L - 3498 L

/

279 - 279

/

AT & Automatic

/

Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

6 Seater - 7

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5

3.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

279

375 BHP

350

530

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • QX60 Sensory

    • Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD)

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • Temperature Display
      • Keyless Entry
      • Rear Camera
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Pedestrian airbag
      • First Aid Kit
      • Fire Extinguisher
      • Door Edge Protector
      • Crosswind Assist
      • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
      • Collision Detection
      • Blind Spot Warning
      • Knee Bag - Driver
      • Speed Limiter
      • Auto Door Lock
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Active braking
      • Lane Departure Warning

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickGenesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD)

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about overall equipment; choose Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Hyundai | Santa Fe Smartstream G2.5T

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Hyundai | Santa Fe Smartstream G2.5T 2025

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Jeep | Wrangler Sahara 2.0T

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Nissan | PATROL SE T2

    Infiniti | QX60 Sensory

    VS

    Lexus | NX350h Platinum 2.5L

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2955. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD), offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Genesis GV80 2023 3.5T Royal (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.