QX60 Sensory vs Land Cruiser GXR3 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
7
7
5033
5115
1981
1980
1770
1945
2900
/
170
/
/
20
Fuel Economy
8.7
10.1
/
110
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Doors
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
Dual
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
Hi Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
/
Central And Rear
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
232 BHP - 409
AT & Automatic & CVT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
3.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
409
350
650
/
V
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Sensory
Land Cruiser GXR3
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser GXR3 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a fuel consumption of 9.9. Therefore, Land Cruiser GXR3 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser GXR3 uses Four-Wheel Drive.