QX60 Sensory vs Prado VXL-3 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7
7 Seater
5033
5025
1981
1980
1770
1992
2900
/
170
/
/
20
Fuel Economy
8.7
10.6
/
110
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
/
Front & Rear Doors
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Front Row Seats
Front and Back Row Seats
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
Dual
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Front Airbags Driver & Passenger + D&P Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
14
Transmission
AT
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
/
✓
/
Central
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
265/60 R20
/
265/60 R20
Key Spec
3.5 L - 3.5 L
2.4 L - 2.4 L
265 BHP - 295 BHP
201 - 267 BHP
AT & Automatic & CVT
8 Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
7 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.4
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
267
350
430
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Sensory
Prado VXL-3
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Driving Recorder
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about price; choose Prado VXL-3 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Prado VXL-3 has a fuel consumption of 9.43. Therefore, Prado VXL-3 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while Prado VXL-3 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Prado VXL-3 uses All Wheel Drive.