QX60 Sensory vs Wrangler Sahara 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5033
4785 mm
1981
1877 mm
1770
1869 mm
2900
3007 mm
170
254 m
/
4 Doors
/
487 L
Fuel Economy
8.7
7 Km/L
/
87 L
/
7 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Triple
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3498 L - 3498 L
2.0 L - 3605 L
279 - 279
270 BHP - 285 BHP
AT & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6 Seater - 7
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
279
270 BHP
350
400 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX60 Sensory
Wrangler Sahara 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickWrangler Sahara 2.0T
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX60 Sensory if you care more about fuel economy; choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX60 Sensory has a fuel consumption of 11.49, while Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, QX60 Sensory is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX60 Sensory has a wheelbase of 2900, while Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX60 Sensory uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.