QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs vs C4 Feel Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
200 km/h
8
/
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5365
4360 mm
2030
2032 mm
1945
1525 mm
3075
2670 mm
470
380 L
Fuel Economy
8.3
17.9 Km/L
100
50 L
/
17.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
14
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
24
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
/
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
5.6 L - 5.6 L
/
400 BHP - 450
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 8 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5
1.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
450
155 BHP
700
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard / Eco / Sport / Personal / Rock / Sand
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
C4 Feel
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful motor and smooth performance
- Luxurious interior design and spacious space
- Advanced technology and intelligent features
Negative
- Low fuel consumption
- The large size of the car affects the controllability
- Maintenance costs and cutting prices are high
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC4 Feel
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs if you care more about interior space; choose C4 Feel if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs has a fuel consumption of 12.05, while C4 Feel has a fuel consumption of 5.59. Therefore, C4 Feel is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs has a wheelbase of 3075, while C4 Feel has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. QX80 Autograph Bench Chairs uses All Wheel Drive, while C4 Feel uses Front Wheel Drive.