R4 vs Volvo C30 2012 T5 Comparison
Engine / Motor
/
235
/
5
Dimensions
/
4 Seater
/
4266
/
1782
/
1447
/
2640
/
233
Fuel Economy
/
15.4
/
62
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
TBD
/
TBD
230 BHP
TBD
Automatic
Electric
Gasoline
TBD
/
TBD
4 Seater
/
2.5 L
/
TBD
Engine
Electric
Gasoline
/
2.5 L
/
230 BHP
/
320
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
R4
Volvo C30 2012 T5
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- First Aid Kit
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickVolvo C30 2012 T5
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose R4 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Volvo C30 2012 T5 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, R4 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Volvo C30 2012 T5 has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, R4 has a wheelbase of No data, while Volvo C30 2012 T5 has a wheelbase of 2640. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. R4 uses No data, while Volvo C30 2012 T5 uses Front Wheel Drive.