Raize 1.0T Limited vs ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
193 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4030 mm
4355 mm
1710 mm
1810 mm
1635 mm
1625 mm
2525 mm
2670 mm
369 L
358 L
Fuel Economy
19.2 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
36 L
63 L
19.2 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.2 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
87 - 97 BHP
150 - 150
Automatic & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT
Automatic & CVT
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
97 BHP
150 BHP
140 Nm
197 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Raize 1.0T Limited
ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRaize 1.0T Limited
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Raize 1.0T Limited if you care more about price; choose ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Raize 1.0T Limited has a fuel consumption of 5.21, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, Raize 1.0T Limited is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Raize 1.0T Limited has a wheelbase of 2525 mm, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Raize 1.0T Limited uses Front Wheel Drive, while ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option uses Front Wheel Drive.