Raize Limited vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

/

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

3

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

17

/

4030

5209

1710

2010

1635

1731

/

3110

Fuel Economy

20.6

/

36

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver And Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

8

/

/

/

4

/

/

/

Transmission

Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

205/60 R17

/

205/60 R17

/

/

Key Spec

1.0 L - 1.2 L

/

87 - 97

429 BHP

Automatic & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

6 - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.0

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

/

97

429 BHP

140

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Raize Limited

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Compact size for flexible urban driving
  • Integrated technological equipment

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • Engine performance is limited at high speeds
  • The quality of interior materials need improvement

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRaize Limited

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Raize Limited if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Raize Limited

VS

Renault | Renault Koleos 2023 2.5L LE (4WD)

Toyota | Raize Limited

VS

Geely | Geely Monjaro 2024 2.0TD Premium GF (4WD)

Toyota | Raize Limited

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2023 2.0T Hyper

Toyota | Raize Limited

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS5 2024 2.0T Comfort

Toyota | Raize Limited

VS

Lynk & Co | Lynk & Co 01 2024 2.0T Hyper

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Raize Limited has a fuel consumption of 4.85, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Raize Limited has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Raize Limited uses Front Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.