CarteaCompare CarsRaize XLE vs EHS9 Executive

Raize XLE vs EHS9 Executive Comparison

Car Information

/

160+245

/

≥500

/

99

Engine / Motor

3

/

/

200 km/h

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

16

/

4030

5209 mm

1710

2010 mm

1635

1713 mm

/

5 Doors

/

3110 mm

/

438 L

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

21.1

/

36

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Fabric

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

Driver And Front Passenger

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

7

16.2

/

/

4

8

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

205/65 R16

/

205/65 R16

/

Key Spec

1.0 L - 1.2 L

/

87 - 97 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

Automatic & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT

Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater - 5 Seater

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

Halogen

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.2

/

Gasoline

Electric

87

429 BHP

113

300+450

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

8

/

options.Lithium-Ion

/

160+245 kW

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Raize XLE

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
  • EHS9 Executive

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Compact size for flexible urban driving
  • Integrated technological equipment

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • Engine performance is limited at high speeds
  • The quality of interior materials need improvement

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRaize XLE

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Raize XLE if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Executive if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Raize XLE

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion Basic

Toyota | Raize XLE

VS

GAC | GS3 1.3T GB

Toyota | Raize XLE

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV

Toyota | Raize XLE

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Enjoy

Toyota | Raize XLE

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2019 1.6L Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Raize XLE has a fuel consumption of 4.74, while EHS9 Executive has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Raize XLE has a wheelbase of No data, while EHS9 Executive has a wheelbase of 3110 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Raize XLE uses Front Drive, while EHS9 Executive uses All Wheel Drive.