Raize XLE vs Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
3
6
/
210 km/h
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
16
/
4030
5115 mm
1710
1980 mm
1635
1920 mm
/
5 Doors
/
2890 mm
/
1004 L
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
21.1
9.4 Km/L
36
110 L
/
9.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Fabric
Fabric
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
Driver And Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
7
9
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
205/65 R16
/
205/65 R16
/
Key Spec
1.0 L - 1.2 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
87 - 97 BHP
240 BHP - 409
Automatic & Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) & CVT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Halogen
LED
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
87
271 BHP
113
385 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Raize XLE
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Compact size for flexible urban driving
- Integrated technological equipment
Negative
- The space of the rear seats is limited
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- The quality of interior materials need improvement
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Raize XLE if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Raize XLE has a fuel consumption of 4.74, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, Raize XLE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Raize XLE has a wheelbase of No data, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR has a wheelbase of 2890 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Raize XLE uses Front Drive, while Land Cruiser 4.0L EXR uses Four Wheel Drive.