RAM 2500 2024 RAM 2500 2024 6.4L Power Wagon vs Shark 6 Premium Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
8
4
/
160 km/h
/
1500 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
6.067
5457 mm
2.119
1971 mm
2.054
1925 mm
3.792
3260 mm
1500
1200 L
/
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
230 mm
Fuel Economy
6.7
12.8
/
59 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
Double-Wishbone
/
Double Wishbone
/
Electric Power Steering (EPS)
Key Spec
0.0 L
1.5T
410 BHP
430 BHP
Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
6400 L
1.5T
Petrol
Hybrid
410 BHP
430 BHP
580
650 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RAM 2500 2024 RAM 2500 2024 6.4L Power Wagon
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Shark 6 Premium
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RAM 2500 2024 RAM 2500 2024 6.4L Power Wagon if you care more about overall equipment; choose Shark 6 Premium if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RAM 2500 2024 RAM 2500 2024 6.4L Power Wagon has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while Shark 6 Premium has a fuel consumption of 12.8. Therefore, Shark 6 Premium is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RAM 2500 2024 RAM 2500 2024 6.4L Power Wagon has a wheelbase of 3.792, while Shark 6 Premium has a wheelbase of 3260 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Shark 6 Premium, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RAM 2500 2024 RAM 2500 2024 6.4L Power Wagon uses All Wheel Drive, while Shark 6 Premium uses All Wheel Drive .