Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L vs Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
6
6 Seater
6,066
5336 mm
2,012
2075 mm
1,981
1758 mm
3,785
3150 mm
Fuel Economy
7.6 Km/L
8.3 Km/L
/
80 L
/
8.3 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
6-speed AISIN Automatic
Manual
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
-
2.5 L
410 - 430
158 BHP - 168 BHP
6-speed AISIN Automatic & 8-speed Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
6
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Engine
6.4L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
410
158 BHP
582
233 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L
Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRam 3500 Laramie 6.4L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L if you care more about price; choose Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L has a fuel consumption of 13.16, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L has a wheelbase of 3,785, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a wheelbase of 3150 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ram 3500 Laramie 6.4L uses No data, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.