Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) vs Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
230 km/h
197 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4371 mm
5110 mm
1996 mm
1925 mm
1649 mm
1847 mm
2681 mm
3043 mm
472 L
487 L
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
9.1 Km/L
67 L
93 L
/
9.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
200 BHP - 250 BHP
290 BHP - 710 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
250 BHP
295 BHP
365 Nm
353 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
Durango 3.6L GT(RWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRange Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) if you care more about price; choose Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) has a wheelbase of 3043 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Durango 3.6L GT(RWD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Evoque 2.0T R-Dynamic HSE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Durango 3.6L GT(RWD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.