Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD vs Defender 90 SE Base (P300) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
216 km/h
191 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4371 mm
4583 mm
1996 mm
2008 mm
1649 mm
1969 mm
2681 mm
2587 mm
472 L
397 L
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
67 L
88.5 L
13.5 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
2.0 L - 5.0 L
200 BHP
300 BHP - 517 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater - 8 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
200 BHP
300 BHP
320 Nm
400 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Defender 90 SE Base (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDefender 90 SE Base (P300)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Defender 90 SE Base (P300) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Defender 90 SE Base (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Defender 90 SE Base (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.