Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD vs Sequoia Limited Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
216 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4371 mm
5285 mm
1996 mm
2021 mm
1649 mm
1892 mm
2681 mm
3100 mm
472 L
2460 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
9 Km/L
67 L
85 L
13.5 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.5 L - 5.7 L
200 BHP - 250 BHP
381 BHP - 437 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater - 8 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
200 BHP
437 BHP
320 Nm
790 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Sequoia Limited
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Powerful engine performance
- High level of reliability
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Limited technical options
- Relatively high price
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRange Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD if you care more about price; choose Sequoia Limited if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Sequoia Limited has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Sequoia Limited has a wheelbase of 3100 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Sequoia Limited, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Sequoia Limited uses All Wheel Drive.