Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD vs XTS 3.6L Luxury Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
216 km/h
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4371 mm
5131 mm
1996 mm
1852 mm
1649 mm
1501 mm
2681 mm
2837 mm
472 L
510 L
Fuel Economy
13.5 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
67 L
76 L
13.5 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L
3.6 L
200 BHP - 250 BHP
304 BHP - 410 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Engine
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
200 BHP
304 BHP
320 Nm
355 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
XTS 3.6L Luxury
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXTS 3.6L Luxury
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose XTS 3.6L Luxury if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while XTS 3.6L Luxury has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while XTS 3.6L Luxury has a wheelbase of 2837 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XTS 3.6L Luxury, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Evoque 2.0T S (200 PS) AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while XTS 3.6L Luxury uses All Wheel Drive.