Range Rover SE P400 3.0L vs Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

220 km/h

/

6

/

3000 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

/

5 Doors

/

5758 mm

/

2123 mm

/

1920 mm

/

3302 mm

/

1251 L

/

254 m

Fuel Economy

8.5

6 Km/L

/

115 L

/

6 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

19

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

/

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L - 5.0 L

3.0 L

360 BHP - 525 BHP

510 BHP

Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5 Seater

7 Seater

Engine

3.0 L

3.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

400 BHP

510 BHP

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

/

678 Nm

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

    • Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

      • Electronic engine immobilizer
      • Power Tailgate
      • 360 Degree camera
      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickGrand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Range Rover SE P400 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy; choose Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

    VS

    Cadillac | Escalade V 6.2L Supercharged

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

    VS

    Maserati | Maserati Levante 2023 3.0T V6 F Tributo

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2020 Turbo

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

    VS

    Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2019 Turbo

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

    VS

    Land Rover | Range Rover SE P400 3.0L

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover SE P400 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, Range Rover SE P400 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Range Rover SE P400 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a wheelbase of 3302 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover SE P400 3.0L uses No data, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.