Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) vs Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

225 km/h

220 km/h

/

6

/

3000 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4946 mm

5758 mm

2047 mm

2123 mm

1820 mm

1920 mm

2997 mm

3302 mm

647 L

1251 L

/

254 m

Fuel Economy

13.5

6 Km/L

90 L

115 L

13.5 Km/L

6 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

19

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L - 5 L

3.0 L

355 BHP - 575 BHP

510 BHP

Automatic

TBD

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

3.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

355 BHP

510 BHP

500 Nm

678 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGrand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) if you care more about fuel economy; choose Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0L SC V6 HST (400 PS)

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2022 Deluxe (6 Seats)

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2021 Deluxe (6 Seats)

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

BMW | X6 xDriveM50i

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a fuel consumption of 16.67. Therefore, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a wheelbase of 2997 mm, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T has a wheelbase of 3302 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Grand Wagoneer Series III 3.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.