Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) vs iX xDrive40 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
225 km/h
200 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4946 mm
4953 mm
2047 mm
1967 mm
1820 mm
1695 mm
2997 mm
3000 mm
647 L
500 L
Fuel Economy
13.5
/
90 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5 L
/
355 BHP - 575 BHP
326 BHP - 619 BHP
Automatic
TBD
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
355 BHP
326 BHP
500 Nm
630 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
iX xDrive40
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickiX xDrive40
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) if you care more about power; choose iX xDrive40 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while iX xDrive40 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a wheelbase of 2997 mm, while iX xDrive40 has a wheelbase of 3000 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, iX xDrive40, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while iX xDrive40 uses All Wheel Drive.