Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) vs Range Rover SE P360 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
225 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4946 mm
/
2047 mm
/
1820 mm
/
2997 mm
/
647 L
/
Fuel Economy
13.5
8.5
90 L
/
13.5 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5 L
3.0 L - 5.0 L
355 BHP - 575 BHP
360 BHP - 525 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
355 BHP
360 BHP
500 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRange Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) if you care more about price; choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a wheelbase of 2997 mm, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data.