Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) vs Urus S 4.0T V8 Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

225 km/h

305 km/h

/

8

/

3996 cc

Dimensions

5 Seater

4 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4946 mm

5123 mm

2047 mm

2022 mm

1820 mm

1638 mm

2997 mm

3003 mm

647 L

617 L

/

172 m

Fuel Economy

13.5

7 Km/L

90 L

75 L

13.5 Km/L

7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

10.1

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

8

Transmission

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

3.0 L - 5 L

4.0 L

355 BHP - 575 BHP

650 BHP - 800 BHP

Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

4 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

4.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

355 BHP

666 BHP

500 Nm

850 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Urus S 4.0T V8

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
  • Unique and eye catching exterior design.
  • A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.

Negative

  • The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
  • High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
  • Limited comfort while driving long distances.

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRange Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) if you care more about price; choose Urus S 4.0T V8 if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0L SC V6 HST (400 PS)

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2022 Deluxe (6 Seats)

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi EHS9 2021 Deluxe (6 Seats)

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

BMW | X6 xDriveM50i

Land Rover | Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS)

VS

Mercedes Benz | AMG EQE 53 4MATIC+

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a fuel consumption of 14.29. Therefore, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) has a wheelbase of 2997 mm, while Urus S 4.0T V8 has a wheelbase of 3003 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Urus S 4.0T V8, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Sport 3.0T HSE Dynamic MHEV (360 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while Urus S 4.0T V8 uses All Wheel Drive.