Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS) vs XTS 3.6L Luxury Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
217 km/h
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4803 mm
5131 mm
2032 mm
1852 mm
1666 mm
1501 mm
2873 mm
2837 mm
532 L
510 L
Fuel Economy
13.2
8.5 Km/L
63 L
76 L
13.2 Km/L
8.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
3.6 L
246 BHP - 340 BHP
304 BHP - 410 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
246 BHP
304 BHP
365 Nm
355 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
XTS 3.6L Luxury
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickXTS 3.6L Luxury
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS) if you care more about fuel economy; choose XTS 3.6L Luxury if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.58, while XTS 3.6L Luxury has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2873 mm, while XTS 3.6L Luxury has a wheelbase of 2837 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Velar 2.0L HSE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while XTS 3.6L Luxury uses All Wheel Drive.