CarteaCompare CarsRange Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) vs PATROL SE Titanium

Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) vs PATROL SE Titanium Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

217 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

8 Seater

4803 mm

5350

2032 mm

2030

1666 mm

1945

2873 mm

3075

532 L

/

/

18

/

244

Fuel Economy

13.2

/

63 L

97

13.2 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

Manual

Interior

/

Front Row Seats

/

14.3

/

/

Monolith Display

/

Driver Seat

/

Premium Leatherette

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

Front+Side+Curtain+Driver Knee

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.8

/

14.3

/

/

/

12

/

KLIPSCH

Transmission

Automatic

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC

/

/

/

9

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

/

/

/

Electric Power Steering

Wheels/brakes

/

Disc

/

Disc

/

265/70 R18

/

265/70 R18

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.0 L

3.5 L - 425 HP (3.5L V6TT) / 316 HP (3.8L V6)

246 BHP - 340 BHP

275 BHP - 495 BHP

Automatic

9 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 9-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 - 8 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

3.8 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

250 BHP

316 BHP

365 Nm

386

/

TYPE 3.8-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS DIG ENGINE

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

ROCK, SAND, ECO, MUD, STANDARD, SPORT

/

/

Auto

/

/

L1

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • PATROL SE Titanium

    • Power Tailgate
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Speed Limiter
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Outstanding off-road performance
  • Outstanding engine power
  • Spacious and luxurious interior design

Negative

  • High fuel consumption
  • High purchase and maintenance costs
  • Slow electronic system response

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRange Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) if you care more about price; choose PATROL SE Titanium if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Audi | Q5 Sportback 45 TFSI quattro Advanced 2.0L (245 HP)

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Nissan | PATROL SE Titanium

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac XTS 2018 3.6L V-Sport Platinum

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Volkswagen | Touareg R-Line 3.0L

Land Rover | Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS)

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2018 3.5L EcoBoost Platinum

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) has a fuel consumption of 7.58, while PATROL SE Titanium has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) has a wheelbase of 2873 mm, while PATROL SE Titanium has a wheelbase of 3075. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, PATROL SE Titanium, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Range Rover Velar 2.0L R-Dynamic SE (250 PS) uses All Wheel Drive, while PATROL SE Titanium uses No data.