Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 vs Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
169
4
4
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
3 Seater
4 Doors
/
5370 mm
5300
1918 mm
1815
1884 mm
1780
3270 mm
3000
1200 L
/
230 m
/
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
10.0
80 L
75
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
6MT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3198 L
2.4 L - 2351 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
128 BHP - 136 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
3 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.4 L
Diesel
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
168 BHP
128 BHP
405 Nm
202
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XL (LOW) 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD)
- Rear Defogger
- Steering Adjustment
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XL (LOW) 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 uses Four Wheel Drive, while Mitsubishi L200 2023 2.4L Single Cab GL (2WD) uses Rear Wheel Drive.