Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 vs T90 Executive 2WD 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
/
5370 mm
5365
1918 mm
1900
1884 mm
1809
3270 mm
3155
1200 L
1485*1510*530
230 m
215
/
1940
/
17
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
/
80 L
/
8 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Smart Key
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
Leather
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
✓
✓
/
Standard
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver's + Sub driver Airbag
/
120Km/h
/
✓
Infotainment
10
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6MT
6AT
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
/
/
Double-wishbone(Heavy-duty)
/
Double-wishbone(Heavy-duty)
Wheels/brakes
/
245/65 R17
/
245/65 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.2 L
2.0 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
161 BHP - 214 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
6AT & 8AT
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Diesel
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
168 BHP
161 BHP
405 Nm
375
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T
/
120
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
POWER/NORMAL/ECO
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XL (LOW) 2025
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
T90 Executive 2WD 2.0T
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose T90 Executive 2WD 2.0T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while T90 Executive 2WD 2.0T has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while T90 Executive 2WD 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3155. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XL (LOW) 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XL (LOW) 2025 uses Four Wheel Drive, while T90 Executive 2WD 2.0T uses No data.