Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT vs F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
8
1998 cc
5200 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4 Doors
4 Doors
5370 mm
5885
1918 mm
2029
1884 mm
1920
3270 mm
3683
1200 L
1230
230
216
Fuel Economy
8 Km/L
5 Km/L
80 L
80 L
8 Km/L
5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Fabric
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Manual
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
12
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
6
14
Transmission
6MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.2 L
3.3 L - 6.2 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
292 BHP - 770 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5
3 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
5.2
Diesel
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
168 BHP
720 BHP
405 Nm
868 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
F150 Raptor 5.2L V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT if you care more about fuel economy; choose F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 has a fuel consumption of 20. Therefore, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 has a wheelbase of 3683. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, F150 Raptor 5.2L V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while F150 Raptor 5.2L V8 uses Four Wheel Drive.