CarteaCompare CarsRanger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT vs Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab

Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT vs Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

140

4

4

1998 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

5370 mm

5040

1918 mm

1800

1884 mm

1730

3270 mm

3050

1200 L

/

230

/

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

9.3

80 L

/

8 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

Transmission

6MT

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.2 L

2.0 L - 2.4 L

118 BHP - 392 BHP

105 BHP - 148

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

5 Speed Manual Transmission & 5-speed Manual Gear & 5MT & 6 Speed Manual Transmission & 6-speed Manual Gear & 6MT & Manual

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 5

4 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0 L

2.2 L

Diesel

Gasoline

Single Turbo

/

4

/

168 BHP

105 BHP

405 Nm

190

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab

    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGreat Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT if you care more about interior space; choose Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT

VS

Chevrolet | Silverado LD High Country

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT

VS

Chevrolet | Silverado LD High Country 6.2L

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2021 5.7L Limited (Double Cab)

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2020 5.7L Limited (Double Cab)

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2022 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.0 Diesel 4WD MT uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab uses All Wheel Drive.