Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD vs Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

140

4

4

2296 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4 Doors

/

5370 mm

5040

1918 mm

1800

1884 mm

1730

3270 mm

3050

1200 L

/

230

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

9.3

80 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

/

Interior

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

/

Transmission

10AT

Manual

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.2 L

/

118 BHP - 392 BHP

/

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

/

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

3 Seater - 5

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.3 L

2.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

298 BHP

105 BHP

452 Nm

190

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab

    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGreat Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ford | Super Duty Pick Up XL

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ford | Ford F-150 2024 3.5T Power Boost Hybrid V6 SuperCrew XLT FX4

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ford | Ford F-150 2024 3.5L EcoBoost SuperCrew Cab XLT

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ram | RAM 2500 2023 6.4L Power Wagon

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ford | Ranger XL (LOW) 2025

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10, while Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Great Wall Wingle 2017 4x4 Double Cab uses All Wheel Drive.