Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD vs Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
182 km/h
4
/
2296 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
5370 mm
5330 mm
1918 mm
1963 mm
1884 mm
1897 mm
3270 mm
3180 mm
1200 L
/
230
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
10.2 Km/L
80 L
80 L
10 Km/L
10.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
10AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3198 L
2.4 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
210 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.3 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
298 BHP
210 BHP
452 Nm
320 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a fuel consumption of 9.8. Therefore, Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) has a wheelbase of 3180 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Landtrek 2.4T DC 4x2 (M/T) uses Rear Wheel Drive.