Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD vs Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
160 km/h
4
/
2296 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
6 Seater
4 Doors
/
5370 mm
5336 mm
1918 mm
2075 mm
1884 mm
1758 mm
3270 mm
3150 mm
1200 L
/
230
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
8.3 Km/L
80 L
80 L
10 Km/L
8.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
10AT
Manual
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.2 L
2.5 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
158 BHP - 168 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.3 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
298 BHP
158 BHP
452 Nm
233 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a fuel consumption of 12.05. Therefore, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T has a wheelbase of 3150 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Navara 2.5L ASF 4x2 M/T uses Rear Wheel Drive.