Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD vs RAM 1500 TRX 2023 6.2L V8 (702 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
8
2296 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
5370 mm
5916
1918 mm
2235
1884 mm
2055
3270 mm
3686
1200 L
1526
230
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
5.1
80 L
125
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
✓
✓
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
10AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
6.2 L
168 BHP - 392 BHP
702 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline
Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.3 L
6.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
4
/
298 BHP
702 BHP
452 Nm
882
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RAM 1500 TRX 2023 6.2L V8 (702 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose RAM 1500 TRX 2023 6.2L V8 (702 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10, while RAM 1500 TRX 2023 6.2L V8 (702 HP) has a fuel consumption of 19.61. Therefore, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while RAM 1500 TRX 2023 6.2L V8 (702 HP) has a wheelbase of 3686. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RAM 1500 TRX 2023 6.2L V8 (702 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while RAM 1500 TRX 2023 6.2L V8 (702 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.