Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD vs RAM 1500 TRX 2024 RAM 1500 TRX 2024 6.2L V8 (702 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
4
8
2296 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5
4 Seater
4 Doors
/
5370 mm
5.916
1918 mm
2.235
1884 mm
2.055
3270 mm
3.686
1200 L
1526
230
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
5.1
80 L
125
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
10AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.2 L
6.2 L
118 BHP - 392 BHP
702 BHP
10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 5
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.3 L
6.2 L
Gasoline
Petrol
4
/
298 BHP
702 BHP
452 Nm
882
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
RAM 1500 TRX 2024 RAM 1500 TRX 2024 6.2L V8 (702 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose RAM 1500 TRX 2024 RAM 1500 TRX 2024 6.2L V8 (702 HP) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10, while RAM 1500 TRX 2024 RAM 1500 TRX 2024 6.2L V8 (702 HP) has a fuel consumption of 19.61. Therefore, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while RAM 1500 TRX 2024 RAM 1500 TRX 2024 6.2L V8 (702 HP) has a wheelbase of 3.686. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while RAM 1500 TRX 2024 RAM 1500 TRX 2024 6.2L V8 (702 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.