Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD vs T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

4

/

2296 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5

5

4 Doors

/

5370 mm

5365

1918 mm

1900

1884 mm

1809

3270 mm

3155

1200 L

/

230

215

/

1880

/

16

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

80 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Manual

/

/

Interior

/

/

Fabric

Fabric

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

2

/

/

Infotainment

12

7

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

4

/

/

Transmission

10AT

6AT

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

/

/

Double Wishbone

/

Leaf Spring

Wheels/brakes

/

245/70 R16 HT

/

245/70 R16 HT

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.2 L

2.0 L - 2.8 L

118 BHP - 392 BHP

147 BHP - 215 BHP

10AT & 6MT & AT & Automatic & Manual

6AT & 6MT

Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

3 Seater - 5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.3 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

298 BHP

215 BHP

452 Nm

330

/

160

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Start
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickT60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Chevrolet | Silverado LD High Country

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Chevrolet | Silverado LD High Country 6.2L

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2021 5.7L Limited (Double Cab)

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ram | RAM 1500 2020 5.7L Limited (Double Cab)

Ford | Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD

VS

Ford | Ford F 150 2022 3.5L EcoBoost Crew Cab Lariat (Luxury+Chrome Pack)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10, while T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD has a wheelbase of 3270 mm, while T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite has a wheelbase of 3155. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Ranger XLT 2.3L Petrol 2WD uses Rear Wheel Drive, while T60 Petrol Double Cab 2WD Elite uses No data.