RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2490 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4570 mm
4760 mm
1845 mm
1930 mm
1660 mm
1927 mm
2660 mm
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
10 Km/L
55 L
75 L
14.9 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2.5 L
2.0 L
170 - 219
223 BHP - 342 BHP
8 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
203 BHP
224 BHP
243 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX has a wheelbase of 2660 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RAV4 2.5L (2WD) EX uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.