CarteaCompare CarsRC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L vs Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN

RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L vs Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN Comparison

Car Information

/

4.1

Engine / Motor

260 km/h

250 km/h

6

6

3490 cc

2998 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

4 Seater

2 Seater

2 Doors

2 Doors

4700 mm

4379 mm

1840 mm

1854 mm

1395 mm

1292 mm

2730 mm

2470 mm

300 L

290 L

135 m

119 mm

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

14.4

66 L

52 L

7 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

TAN Leather

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Sports

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

/

8 SPEED AUTOMATIC

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Wheel Drive

/

McPherson Strut Coil Springs

/

Double Wishbone

/

Electric Power Steering (EPS)

Key Spec

3.5 L - 5.0 L

2.0 L - 3.0 L

241 - 471 BHP

255 BHP - 382 BHP

8-speed automatic & 8-Speed Sport Direct Shift Automatic

6-Manual Transmission & 8 SPEED AUTOMATIC & 8-Speed Automatic & 8-Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic & Manual

Petrol & Gasoline

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5

2 Seater - 2 Seater

Engine

V

/

3.5 L

3.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

4

312 BHP

382 BHP

377 Nm

500 Nm

/

3.0L 6-CYL DIRECT INJECT TURBO

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

    • Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN

      • Rear Defogger
      • Rear Power Outlet
      • Heated Side Mirrors
      • Parking sensor rear
      • Parking sensor front
      • Keyless Start
      • Heater
      • Rear Camera
      • Headlight On Reminder
      • Remote key types
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
      • Driver Seat Belt Warning
      • ABS
      • EBD/CBC
      • EBA/BA
      • Passive Pedestrian Protection
      • Child Lock
      • Speed Alert
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • Power performance and Sports Control
    • Unique and attractive exterior design
    • Quality workmanship and attention to detail

    Negative

    • Limited seating and storage space
    • Limited driving comfort due to the suspension
    • High cost compared to competitors

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickToyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L if you care more about interior space; choose Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN if you care more about price.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Lexus | RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

    VS

    Porsche | 718 Cayman Std 2.0L A/T

    Lexus | RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

    VS

    Lexus | RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

    Lexus | RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

    VS

    BMW | Z4 Roadster 2025 xDrive20i

    Lexus | RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

    VS

    MG | Cyberster GT

    Lexus | RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L

    VS

    Toyota | Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN has a fuel consumption of 6.94. Therefore, Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L has a wheelbase of 2730 mm, while Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN has a wheelbase of 2470 mm . Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RC 350 F Sport Platinum 3.5L uses All Wheel Drive, while Toyota Supra GR 3.0L A/T TAN uses Rear Wheel Drive .