Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs L5 6.0 V12 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
190 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4147
5555 mm
1740
2018 mm
1534
1578 mm
2630
3435 mm
560
/
Fuel Economy
12.0
5 Km/L
50
105 L
/
5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
1.6 L
6.0 L
105 BHP
402 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.6 L
6.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
402 BHP
128
550 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
L5 6.0 V12
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickL5 6.0 V12
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about fuel economy; choose L5 6.0 V12 if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while L5 6.0 V12 has a fuel consumption of 20. Therefore, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while L5 6.0 V12 has a wheelbase of 3435 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, L5 6.0 V12, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while L5 6.0 V12 uses All Wheel Drive.