Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic vs S7 TFSI quattro 2.9L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

185

250 km/h

4

6

/

2895 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4147

4969 mm

1740

1926 mm

1534

1422 mm

2630

2969 mm

560

390 L

/

4 Doors

/

106 m

Fuel Economy

12.0

8 Km/L

50

65 L

/

8 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

4-Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

12.6

/

/

/

/

/

14

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

1.6 L

2.9 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

105 BHP

445 BHP

128

600 Nm

/

V

/

Twin Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Keyless Entry
    • Steering Adjustment
  • S7 TFSI quattro 2.9L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickS7 TFSI quattro 2.9L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic if you care more about fuel economy; choose S7 TFSI quattro 2.9L if you care more about interior space.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while S7 TFSI quattro 2.9L has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic has a wheelbase of 2630, while S7 TFSI quattro 2.9L has a wheelbase of 2969 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, S7 TFSI quattro 2.9L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Logan 2013 4 Door 1.6L Automatic uses Front Wheel Drive, while S7 TFSI quattro 2.9L uses All Wheel Drive.