Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE vs A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186
250 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4905
5172 mm
1787
1945 mm
1475
1473 mm
2775
2998 mm
555
505 L
Fuel Economy
12.0
12.5 Km/L
70
72 L
/
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
3.0 L - 6.3 L
137 BHP - 240 BHP
290 BHP - 520 BHP
Automatic
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
340 BHP
196
500 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickA8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE if you care more about overall equipment; choose A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP) has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE has a wheelbase of 2775, while A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP) has a wheelbase of 2998 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl PE uses Front Wheel Drive, while A8 55 TFSI quattro (340 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.