Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl SE vs H9 2.0T Deluxe Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
186
250 km/h
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4905
5137 mm
1787
1904 mm
1475
1493 mm
2775
3060 mm
555
/
Fuel Economy
12.0
14.1 Km/L
70
62 L
/
14.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 3.0 L
140 BHP - 240 BHP
241 - 321 BHP
Automatic
7DCT & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
140 BHP
252 BHP
196
380 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl SE
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
H9 2.0T Deluxe
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRenault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl SE
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl SE if you care more about price; choose H9 2.0T Deluxe if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl SE has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while H9 2.0T Deluxe has a fuel consumption of 7.09. Therefore, H9 2.0T Deluxe is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl SE has a wheelbase of 2775, while H9 2.0T Deluxe has a wheelbase of 3060 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, H9 2.0T Deluxe, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Safrane 2014 2.0L, 4cyl SE uses Front Wheel Drive, while H9 2.0T Deluxe uses Rear Wheel Drive.