Renault Safrane 2017 2.0L PE vs Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ Comparison
Car Information
/
3.4
Engine / Motor
186
250
4
8
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4897
4993
2072
1907
1483
1460
2762
2939
477
540
Fuel Economy
12.0
11.0
70
66
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
3.0 L - 3.0 L
140 BHP - 240 BHP
367 - 449
Automatic
9-speed automatic & 9-speed automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.0 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
137 BHP
612 BHP
191
850
Comparison of configuration highlights
Renault Safrane 2017 2.0L PE
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Renault Safrane 2017 2.0L PE if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Renault Safrane 2017 2.0L PE has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a fuel consumption of 9.09. Therefore, Renault Safrane 2017 2.0L PE is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Renault Safrane 2017 2.0L PE has a wheelbase of 2762, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ has a wheelbase of 2939. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Renault Safrane 2017 2.0L PE uses Front Wheel Drive, while Mercedes-Benz E 63 AMG 2023 S 4MATIC+ uses All Wheel Drive.