Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) vs DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
170 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
5265 mm
1720 mm
1870 mm
1680 mm
1785 mm
3050 mm
3125 mm
830 L
/
Fuel Economy
12.7 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
60 L
72 L
12.7 Km/L
12.5 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
1.9 L - 3.0 L
217 BHP
79 BHP - 190 BHP
Manual
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline
Diesel
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
3 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
Engine
2.4 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Diesel
217 BHP
190 BHP
136 Nm
450 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rich 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRich 2.4L DC (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about price; choose DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT has a fuel consumption of 8. Therefore, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT has a wheelbase of 3125 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rich 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while DMax 3.0L Crew Cab 4WD GT uses Four Wheel Drive.