Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) vs ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
160 km/h
160
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5080 mm
5080
1820 mm
1720
1715 mm
1680
3050 mm
3050
830 L
830
Fuel Economy
12.2 Km/L
12.7
60 L
60
12.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Manual
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L
2.4 L
217 BHP
217 BHP
Manual
Manual
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
217 BHP
217 BHP
136 Nm
136
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rich 2.4L DC (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2)
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) if you care more about overall equipment; choose ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 8.2, while ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 7.87. Therefore, ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm, while ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive, while ZNA Rich 2020 2.4L DC (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive.