Roewe D7 Standard vs 7 2.0L Turbo Comparison

Car Information

4,890 x 1,890x1,510

/

125

/

21

/

Engine / Motor

180

260 km/h

/

4

/

1990 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

17"

/

2,810

2778 mm

/

/

/

4 Doors

/

4884 mm

/

1889 mm

/

1447 mm

/

450 L

/

179 m

Fuel Economy

23.26 Km/L

10 Km/L

55

55 L

/

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

10.25-Inch Full LCD Digital Instrument Cluster

/

Passenger Seat

/

Leathers

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Bucket

Safety

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

12.3"

12.3

/

Android LCD

/

6

8

/

/

/

Transmission

AT

/

Chassis & Steering

MacPherson Independent / Rear Multi-link Independent

/

Front Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

100 + 201

185 - 261

AT

7DCT & 9-Speed Automatic

Hybrid

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

100 + 201

257 BHP

128

405 Nm

/

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Motor

Lithium Iron Phosphate

/

Technologies

/

/

/

Comfort / Standard/Sport

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Roewe D7 Standard

    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Keyless Entry
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
  • 7 2.0L Turbo

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick7 2.0L Turbo

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Roewe D7 Standard if you care more about fuel economy; choose 7 2.0L Turbo if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

ROEWE | Roewe D7 Standard

VS

Hyundai | Sonata 2.0 Base HEV

ROEWE | Roewe D7 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Camry 2019 2.5L SE (178 HP)

ROEWE | Roewe D7 Standard

VS

Toyota | Toyota Camry 2018 2.5L SE (178 HP)

ROEWE | Roewe D7 Standard

VS

Alfa Romeo | Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2021 Super

ROEWE | Roewe D7 Standard

VS

Mazda | Mazda 6 2022 2.5L V w/ Sunroof

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Roewe D7 Standard has a fuel consumption of 4.3, while 7 2.0L Turbo has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Roewe D7 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Roewe D7 Standard has a wheelbase of 2,810, while 7 2.0L Turbo has a wheelbase of 2778 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Roewe D7 Standard, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Roewe D7 Standard uses Front Drive, while 7 2.0L Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive.