Rolls Royce Cullinan 2020 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) vs Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid Comparison
Car Information
/
SUVEngine / Motor
250
312 km/h
12
8
/
3996 cc
Dimensions
5 Seater
4 Seater
5341
5123 mm
2164
2022 mm
1835
1638 mm
3295
3003 mm
600
617 L
/
5 Doors
/
172 m
Fuel Economy
6.7
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.1
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
6.7 L
4.0 L
563 BHP
650 BHP - 800 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
6.7 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
563 BHP
800 BHP
850
800 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Rolls Royce Cullinan 2020 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Active Bonnet
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Rolls Royce Cullinan 2020 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) if you care more about interior space; choose Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Rolls Royce Cullinan 2020 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a fuel consumption of 14.93, while Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Rolls Royce Cullinan 2020 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) has a wheelbase of 3295, while Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid has a wheelbase of 3003 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Rolls Royce Cullinan 2020 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rolls Royce Cullinan 2020 6.75L Twin-Turbo (563 HP) uses All Wheel Drive, while Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid uses All Wheel Drive.