RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
280 km/h
200
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
8 Seater
4507 mm
5170
1851 mm
1980
1557 mm
1930
2681 mm
2850
530 L
455
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
7.5
64 L
138
14.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
400 BHP
271 BHP
480 Nm
385
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
/
3.3 L - 4000 L
/
240 BHP - 409
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
/
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 8 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Editor's PickToyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback if you care more about fuel economy; choose Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR has a fuel consumption of 13.33. Therefore, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback has a wheelbase of 2681 mm, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR has a wheelbase of 2850. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 2.5L TFSI quattro Sportback uses All Wheel Drive, while Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.0L GXR uses All Wheel Drive.