CarteaCompare CarsRS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L vs EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC

RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L vs EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC Comparison

Car Information

/

412-423

/

66.5

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

180 km/h

4

/

2480 cc

/

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

5 Doors

5 Doors

4485 mm

4684 mm

1856 mm

2020 mm

1585 mm

1667 mm

2680 mm

2,829 mm

530 L

495 L

170 m

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

/

65 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Digital

Digital

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Sports

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

8

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L

/

400 BHP

288 BHP

TBD

Automatic

Gasoline

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

7 Seater

/

TBD

/

345 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.5 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

Single Turbo

/

4

/

400 BHP

288 BHP

480 Nm

520 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

9

/

options.Lithium

/

215 kW

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC

    • Remote key types

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L if you care more about price; choose EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

VS

Mercedes Benz | EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC

Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

VS

Toyota | Toyota Land Cruiser 2018 4.6L GXR

Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

VS

Ford | Ford Bronco 2021 2.7T Big Lands

Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2024 2.7T V6 Reserve LUX PKG

Audi | RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L

VS

Porsche | Porsche Macan 2020 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L has a fuel consumption of 10, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L has a wheelbase of 2680 mm, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 2,829 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro 2.5L uses All Wheel Drive, while EQB 350 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.