CarteaCompare CarsRS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan vs E300 3.0L

RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan vs E300 3.0L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

280 km/h

260 km/h

4

4

2480 cc

2998 cc

GCC

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4 Doors

4 Doors

4492 mm

4949 mm

1816 mm

1880 mm

1425 mm

1480 mm

2521 mm

2961 mm

355 L

540 L

165 m

/

Fuel Economy

8 Km/L

9 Km/L

50 L

66 L

8 Km/L

9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

Bucket

/

Digital

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

8

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L

2.0 L - 3.0 L

400 BHP

204 BHP - 402

TBD

7-speed Automatic (7G-TRONIC Plus) & 9-speed automatic & Automatic

Gasoline

Petrol & Diesel & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

4 Seater - 5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

In-Line

2.5 L

3.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Single Turbo

Single Turbo

4

4

400 BHP

285 BHP

500 Nm

420 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • E300 3.0L

    • Remote key types

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan if you care more about price; choose E300 3.0L if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan

VS

Maserati | Maserati Ghibli 2020 3.0T V6

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan

VS

Maserati | Maserati Ghibli 2019 3.0T V6

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi H9 2024 3.0T Deluxe

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan

VS

Audi | Audi A6 2022 55 TFSI Design Quattro (340 HP)

Audi | RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan

VS

Audi | Audi A6 2021 55 TFSI Design Quattro (340 HP)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan has a fuel consumption of 12.5, while E300 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, E300 3.0L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan has a wheelbase of 2521 mm, while E300 3.0L has a wheelbase of 2961 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, E300 3.0L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS3 TFSI quattro 2.5L Sedan uses All Wheel Drive, while E300 3.0L uses All Wheel Drive.