RS6 Avant Performance vs Defender 90 SE (P300) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
191 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4995
4583 mm
1951
2008 mm
1483
1969 mm
2930
2587 mm
1668
/
1650
/
/
5 Doors
/
397 L
Fuel Economy
8.2
10 Km/L
/
88 L
/
10 Km/L
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0
2.0 L - 3.0 L
630 BHP
300 BHP - 400 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater - 8 Seater
Engine
4.0
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
630 BHP
300 BHP
/
V
/
Single Turbo
/
400 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS6 Avant Performance
Defender 90 SE (P300)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDefender 90 SE (P300)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS6 Avant Performance if you care more about interior space; choose Defender 90 SE (P300) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS6 Avant Performance has a fuel consumption of 12.2, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Defender 90 SE (P300) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS6 Avant Performance has a wheelbase of 2930, while Defender 90 SE (P300) has a wheelbase of 2587 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RS6 Avant Performance, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS6 Avant Performance uses No data, while Defender 90 SE (P300) uses All Wheel Drive.