RS6 Avant Performance vs EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
260 km/h
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4995
5125 mm
1951
2157 mm
1483
1718 mm
2930
3210 mm
1668
/
1650
/
/
5 Doors
/
645 L
Fuel Economy
8.2
/
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Key Spec
4.0
/
630 BHP
357 BHP - 650
Automatic
1-speed direct drive (EV) & Automatic & Single-speed automatic & Single-speed automatic (EV)
Gasoline
Electric
TBD
/
5
5 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
485 km - 700 km
Engine
4.0
/
Gasoline
Electric
630 BHP
357 BHP
/
800 Nm
Exterior
/
✓
Motor
/
10
/
options.Lithium-ion
/
265 kW
Comparison of configuration highlights
RS6 Avant Performance
EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
- Remote key types
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEQS 450 SUV 4MATIC
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose RS6 Avant Performance if you care more about power; choose EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, RS6 Avant Performance has a fuel consumption of 12.2, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, RS6 Avant Performance has a wheelbase of 2930, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC has a wheelbase of 3210 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. RS6 Avant Performance uses No data, while EQS 450 SUV 4MATIC uses All Wheel Drive.