CarteaCompare CarsRush 1.5L EX vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

Rush 1.5L EX vs Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) Comparison

Car Information

/

8.3

/

Engine / Motor

175 km/h

190

4

4

1490 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

5 Doors

/

4435 mm

4.275

1695 mm

1.765

1705 mm

1.535

2685 mm

2.570

213 L

240

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

15.4

45 L

48

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Rear Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

103 BHP

145 BHP - 148 BHP

Automatic

6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

In-Line

/

1.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

None

/

4

/

103 BHP

148 BHP

135 Nm

192

Motor

/

N/A

Technologies

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Rush 1.5L EX

    • Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

      • Keyless Entry
      • Steering Adjustment
      • Anti-Theft Alarm System
      • Number of Airbags
      • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
      • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
      • ABS
      • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
      • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
      • Active braking

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Modern and attractive design
    • Spacious and comfortable interior
    • Economical fuel efficiency

    Negative

    • Engine performance is poor at high speeds
    • Low quality interior design
    • Lack of modern technical features

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickRush 1.5L EX

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Rush 1.5L EX if you care more about price; choose Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L EX

    VS

    Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Innovation

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L EX

    VS

    Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L EX

    VS

    Dongfeng | AX7 E1

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L EX

    VS

    Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2024 1.6L Active+ (115HP)

    Toyota | Rush 1.5L EX

    VS

    Mazda | Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Rush 1.5L EX has a fuel consumption of 8, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Rush 1.5L EX has a wheelbase of 2685 mm, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Rush 1.5L EX, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Rush 1.5L EX uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD) uses All Wheel Drive.